>The VFP ODBC driver already provides free access to VFP data. So, MS is already doing "bad marketing".
Possibly, but two wrongs don't make a right, do they?
>In this context, how is the OLE DB provider different from the ODBC driver?
Ask the Fox Team.
>MS's policy is inconsistent with its other free downloads
Hardly. Its only inconsitent if you refuse to look at any of the details besides the fact that they are all OLE-DB providers. If you take a glimpse at what they are providers to, you should notice that FoxPro is definitly in a different class of databases available from Microsoft.
>Besides being inconsistent it's also non-enforceable, since any VFP owner can create a "Hello, World" app that includes the driver and give it away (or charge $1). Where's MS's revenue in that?
I don't see why this is relevant. The fact that there are low lifes that cheat and steal should not discourage a company from selling a product. Record companies haven't just given up as you suggest MS should do and start handing out their product for free, even though its hardly enforcable to stop someone from burning a prirated CD. Besides, if only 5% of the users pay, thats more money they would get if they gave it away for free. This sounds like the start of a new thread that I'm not interested in at the moment.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only