>Hi George.
>
>>> I personally wouldn't recommend anything less than Win2K Pro for business applications. Further, I think that pursuing anything less (including WinMe) is being "penny wise and pound foolish". <<
>
>Andy and I were discussing subject this earlier today. The only reason (other than the one you stated) I can think of for going to Win98 is that the company will more than likely have to upgrade its hardware too in order to upgrade to Win2k Pro. Depending on the size of the company, even with how inexpensive hardware is these days, that could wind up being a huge chunk of change < s >.

Perhaps I'm spoiled by Shaw.< s > Computers here can be requisitioned. However, there's also the matter of the value of the information being stored on a given computer. In my mind, the question isn't "Can we afford to...?", but "Can we afford not to...?"

>
>>> Nice new pic, BTW. <<
>
>Thanks. But what are you seeing that I'm not? I'm still seeing the old pic on my machine :(

As Nadya said it's your cache. When I wrote the previous message I was at home. Here at the office, however, it still shows the old one. Rather than clearing my cache, however, if I just refresh the message, the new one will be downloaded. Or at least that's what it's done in the past.< g >