*I* researched it. Had to; the class has my good name on it :-)

In my tests, it was about 40% faster. Fabio says that it's much, much faster under certain conditions but I know for a fact it's 40% faster on average.

Fabio had a brilliant idea for 1.50 to ameliorate the cross-process speed issues; it involves preformatting the data on one document and then moving everything en masse to another. Simply brilliant.


>
>I think, Renoir made a valid point. You can check UT rules and find out, what there is no need to repeat the thread on the same topic, even if it got no response.
>
>Hopefully, Fabio will see this thread (or earlier one) and respond, but I doubt, anyone has necessary statistics already...
>
>>>>>>>No need to repost the same message #599484. If someone knows the answer they will respond.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Renoir
>>>>>>
>>>>>>i am too lazy to do the research myself.
>>>>>
>>>>>Dave,
>>>>>
>>>>>Not sure what thay has to do with posting the same message twice.
>>>>>
>>>>>Renoir
>>>>
>>>>i guess you are too lazy as well :)
>>>
>>>Dave,
>>>
>>>What are you talking about?!
>>>
>>>Renoir
>>
>>too lazy to interpret what i said..
>>which was "i am too lazy to do the research"
>>which means..
>>i am not gonna research whether or not i have asked a question before...
>>now we could research the percentage of repeat questions i have asked ...
>>i'll let you handle that one...
>>this thread so far is a waste of time... i gotta get some work done....