>I think this idea of Peter's would be a dynamo for pulling in new PUTMs.... if it is not too hard to achieve.
>I am a bit surprised that you think PUTMS might object, since it is to their advantage as well that UT becomes as big as possible.
>I for one would never take the gamble that the full archive search capabilty is not available when I need it. You could make it random if you have concerns in that area.
>It was the restriction in my own ability to search the archive that made me pressure my manager into getting PUTM membership for me.

Well, at least, it's good to hear such opinion.