>>Whats the real question here?
>>The number (68%) is too high or too low based on your expectations?
>
>>I am not surprised that the majority of the applications was developped using the only standard capabilities" of vfp... :-)
>
>You got it, I though it was lower. I'm a "dinosaur" (see last survey) and though I was very outdated, based in what I've seen people talking about, but now... :-)
>
>Now let me ask you, why you were not surprised? You based your espectations in what?
>
>Mercy!
>
>Fernando

I am not surprise that the majority of app used only the basic capabilities of VFP. But, like you, I was surprised by the low number. I will have expect a number near 80%. You know that must of the time, peoples does not use the full power of the software they buy. Do you know somebody who can claim that he use 100% of the capabillities of VFP or Word?

On the other hand, I do not have worked on this kind of app since a long time. For the last couples of years, I have work mostly on Web project with VFP and WebConnection...

:-)