>>What do you mean with "The declaration/utilization of the WinAPI in VFP seems to be so much cleaner than FPW26"?
>
>What I mean is that in FPW26 you would have to use the undocumented FOXTOOLS's CallFn() RegFn() in order to use ani WinAPI functions, in VFP most of the API functions can be DECALREd; with a VFP statement.

There is a FoxTools.hlp file. Does this mean is documented? :)

>And don't get me wrong, I am not too enthusiastic about using WinAPI in VFP, I

I never said that! :)

>And I still believe that the (official) subject of this thread (Accept Win32 user messages) somehow implied the utilization of WinAPI.

I think so.

Vlad