Michel;

Thank you very much. Very clean - I like it!

Tom


>>That would be great, it gets my vote.
>
>It is now effective.
>
>>You are right in that I was not aware of a virtual -vs- non-virtual approach. Is this a feature available to everyone or only PUTM?
>
>It's part of PUTM.
>
>>I have not found a situation that I had to build a class in a specific language. I have seen procedures that would be easier to write in say VB versus C# and vice-versa. This will become more obvious as more .NET languages become available. I do believe most developers will try to stick with a single language.
>
>Yes, that's what I believe. But, from what I understand, when necessary, it should be more easier to build a specific component to complete the application in a related environment.