>Sorry to ask this again, because I know some months ago this was dealt with, but I don't know what to search for.
>
>Why nowadays the LI tags are not allowed anymore ? This worked before, (without UL). See Thread #558803 Message #562903 for the example.
>
>As it looks to me, before there must have been some Java (or so) in the Message that allowed it, or better : today there is some that prevents it from working. But then, how would it be possible that the OLD Message still can be replied upon ? (like Message #562903). Can't understand this.
>
>Wouldn't you say that it is a rather necessary thing ? (but including UL please because of indenting).
>Sorry to bring this up again.

There is no restriction for LI but there is for UL.