Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Manuals and trees
Message
From
17/01/2002 11:35:20
 
 
To
17/01/2002 10:33:24
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00605603
Message ID:
00606149
Views:
24
Any timber company that works the way it did in the 1980's is totally irresponsible. The best example of Environmental Forestry is Plum Creek Timber. You can see their timber management practices and independent audits at www.plumcreek.com.

>
>If Norse and Morrison are correct, unprotected old-growth in the Northwest would disappear within 30 to 40 years at recent logging rates (approximately 19,000 hectares/year). However, since so much of what remains is fragmented or otherwise compromised by proximity to roads and clearcuts, the ecologically viable old-growth forest area outside of protected area could disappear far faster. According to Norse, with logging rates and harvesting patterns similar to those of the 1980's, any old growth forest remaining outside of protected areas would come under the damaging influence of windthrow and radical microclimatic shifts within 20-25 years.
Craig Berntson
MCSD, Microsoft .Net MVP, Grape City Community Influencer
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform