Well I'll commit the faux-pas of faux-pas and ask Just exactly what was the standard that Mr. Green was held to???

Was it one to keep mum about VFP? He scored excellently if it was.

Was it one to ignore the VFP community at large? Again, top marks if it was.

Was it to keep the advertising budget for VFP at the scale of a welfare recipient's? Wins again.

On a more serious note, though, it would be enlightening if you would define the standard under which Mr. Green operated (and was constrained?).

Jim


>Mike..
>
>I am simply holding Ken and the marketing effort to the same standard as Robert Green was held to...
>
>Do you think this is unfair? Specifically, exactly how should I get a grip and how is/was this unfair?