Boy, the lengths some people go to "protect" a previously-stated 'position' - the one that SPs for VFP will be ONLY for fixes!

MS (the VFP Team) said the SP contained "enhancements". MS (the VFP Team) put a section in the README titled "improvements. . ." and you can still concoct a story that this was viewed by MS as a "bug".

What it looks like to us is what it is - an enhancement! I personally don't care what they might call it internally, if that's what it takes to get enhancements into SPs for VFP.

It was an odd 'policy' when it was stated and if the VFP Team has "seen the light", that's a good thing, not a bad thing. Ask yourself, what other MS SPs are strictly for fixes? Any that I've seen always include enhancements and new features.



>I think if you could see how this was classified at MS, it would probably be a bug. To us, it looks like something new.
>
>>Under "Improvements in Service Pack 1" of the README. . .
>>
>>XMLToCursor() Function...
>>
>>A new flag...
>>
>>
>>...was.
>>
>>Also, the announcement itselkf says "...SP-1 combines various enhancements and stability improvements..."
>>
>>
>>
>>>Which was????
>>>
>>>>Not to mention that we DID get an enhancement in SP1!!!!!
>>>>
>>>>So more can now be considered, one would hope.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Craig,
>>>>>
>>>>>It's a bug...you can't even grab the slider...
>>>>>
>>>>>< UPDATE >
>>>>>Mike acknowledges the problem in Thread #548897 Message #549270.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>You need to add this to the Toledo wish list here on the UT. SPs only address bugs. This is an enhancement request.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>