>I don't know VB. Why do you say that VFP is more OOP than VB?
>
>Vlad
>
>>What I really mean is, why did vfp become more OOP than vb? Even if vfp isn't really going to die, it certainly seems like vb got 10 times the attention from Microsoft. Given that fact, how did vfp end up with more OOP features?

Among other things, major difference is VFP is object "oriented" (inheritance). VB is object "based" (no inheritance).