>>>Huh? Windows 98 was like a Jenga tower compared to 2K. Why would you make that claim?
>>Win 98 will crash all too often on my development and client machines. I like Windows 2K as it is more stable than NT 4.0. XP seems even more stable. Could there be a reason? :)
>
>So are you saying that your expierence is similar to mine? I was asking Jerry why he said that 98 and 2K have the same crash rate.

Yes. My experience with these specific products is the newer version has greater stability. W98 is not in the same league as W2000 or XP. In fact W2000 and XP are better compared to NT.


>
>>Win 95 was great - compared to Windows 3.11, etc. By the way I have Windows 286 and 386 and used them. Each version of the Microsoft Operating System has improved as far as I am concerned. I do not think it has anything to do with marketing but a lot to do with reality!
>
>How does this relate to my question of Jerry?

As I have seen and used each version of Microsoft Windows that has been available to the public each "new" version has been more stable than the previous one. I think that is by design and not a way to just increase sales or profits.

Tom