>>>>>I don't know VB. Why do you say that VFP is more OOP than VB?
>>>>>
>>>>>Vlad
>>>>>
>>>>>>What I really mean is, why did vfp become more OOP than vb? Even if vfp isn't really going to die, it certainly seems like vb got 10 times the attention from Microsoft. Given that fact, how did vfp end up with more OOP features?
>>>>
>>>>Among other things, major difference is VFP is object "oriented" (inheritance). VB is object "based" (no inheritance).
>>>
>>>Are you sure? What version? I'm almost sure that this is not true anymore for VB5.
>>>
>>>Vlad
>>
>>You may be right about VB5. I don't use VB either. Only going by what I learned about a year ago in some VFP training.
>
>I would say that we must compare corresponding versions and not blame what we don't know. :)
>
>I just heard too many times non-FoxPro programmers blaming VFP (without knowing VFP, obviously). :) I don't want to do the same with VB! :)
>
>Vlad
I myself use VB somewhat, and to my knowledge, even with VB5, it is still object based.