>>Yeah, I know what you mean. An instance on a form seems to fall somewhere between a subclass and an object. Then again, I'm not about to complain about the capability to add code. I'll have to take your word for it on the "partical-wave" thing <g>.
>
>Briefly, physisists debated for a long while whether light was a particle or a wave - it obviously couldn't be both! At the beginning of the 20th. century, it was decided that light was, indeed, both - in a queer way that differed markedly from "classical physics".
>
>Later, it was also discovered that normal matter (electrons, for a start, but any other particle as well) had both "particle" and "wave" properties.
>
>Hilmar.
Later, it was determined that the "wave" actually represented a probability distribution - the probability to find a particle at a certain place.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)