>>I absolutely agree. It doesn't work and screwes lots of messages (or FAQs items). If one message contains more than 1 code fragments, it does it incorrectly, etc.
>>Before implementing this feature it should be thoroughly tested in different variations. Currently it doesn't help, but makes a mess.
>>Or you can introduce new tags for auto-coloring and leave pre tags the way, they were originally.
>
>I fixed the bug. When I plugged the new version last night, I forgot to remove two lines which were affecting generating when more than PRE tag is found in a content. So, all is ok as it was. The only exceptions are those messages, a few

Thanks, it's now working fine.

dozens, that users may have entered coloring syntax in it. As mentioned in the news, we have adjusted all FAQ items. You shouldn't have any problem with any
of them now. I manually adjusted 10 of them last night. Unless I forgot some, that one should be resolved now. I'll also apply a verification for the last two year messages to detect those exceptions in order to adjust them also. As for any incoming message, that shouldn't represent a problem.

BTW, how about Sergey's message? What if it's a C++ code, for example?