JVP >> I recall asking you for a list of tangible things accomplished. To date, you have not been able to provide a list....

SB >> Sorry, you lost me. When? For what purpose?

JVP >> Go through the messages. I have only been echoing the request 3 or 4 times.

You suck. For what purpose, John? Let's hear it.


SB >>Here we have a guy, JVP, a part-time software developer, a guy with no practical experience in a brand new software tool, clairvoyantly ushering us to the promised land with this new tool. How am I doing so far?

JVP >>Not good. I do this on a full-time basis.

Liar! Where does law school fit in there days, John? Are you not considered a full-time student at the university you are attending? Or are you mailing that in?

>> As for practical experience using .NET, I have more than the average person as nobody has a lot of practical experience.

Ah. So we can all conclude, without a shred of ambiguity, that you personally have no practical experience with implementing dot net applications.

Why then are you constantly making recommendations to people without knowing their specific situations and needs, nevermind that you know jack-shit about this area? Where do you stand ethically, John?

I see you've very recently deleted "Microsoft MVP" from your UT sig. That's good, that's a start. This is less likely to result in injurious reliance. That was my main beef in all this: you're leading people on without properly considering their needs, and without the knowledge that people will naturally assume you possess with MVP in your sig.


>
>For the record, I am not advocating that people should dump VFP today...
>

We are all aware what your advocations are, John.

>More ad hominum attacks on your part will do nothing to solidify your point.

Keep playing that card, John. My point is rock-solid, both technically and morally. I can't stand when people are given advice under the false pretense of expert knowledge. That's ethically unacceptable.


**--** Steve