>>I agree with some of the others. This may be a good idea in theory, but it seems like there are too many old posts that aren't updated correctly. I think a new tag like Nadya suggested would be a better approach. Like I said, the idea of auto-formatting the code is good, but going back and trying to retrofit existing messages doesn't seem like a good idea to me. I don't know if I like the idea of having my old posts modified by a program.
>
>You may forget about another tag. We will never support two ways of doing it.
>
>I only asked for patience this morning on this as I already mentioned at several occasions that old messages, for those few exceptions, that they'll be rearrange so initial coloring will dissappear thus will not interfere with the parsing.
>
>Your interpretation of the fact that we will modify your post is based on information you may not have. What we will do won't change your message in any way. We will remove coloring syntax you have done as the parsing already does it now. So, this won't touch your message content nor layout.
>:)

Hi Michel,

I have a quite a few messages where I used < b > tag inside < pre > tag to highlite suggested changes to the code. Now they are shows as a tags not as a bold. How are you going to fix those?
For example, Message #604932, Message #565149.