Mike,

What does the current state of .Net server have to do with the acceptance of VS.Net? I wasn't aware that the servers were required. I've been doing a bunch of reading on ASP.Net over the last couple days and I've read stories of lots of folks running under ASP.NET and liking the results.


PF

>>>Bah. Have you run any .NET apps on Windows .NET server or IIS6?
>>Yes and your point is????
>
>Whats your favorite new security feature in Windows .NET Server?
>


>I don't think I am. IIRC, I repeatedly suggested that it takes more than a nice IDE and framework to make a sucessful Web service platform and you said something about but developer productivy is how IS manager's make their decisions.
>
>>VFP 3 was a complete paradigm shift from Fox 2.x - period...
>
>And VS6 to VS.NET is a minor upgrade? The new ASP.NET, ADO.NET, CLR, IDE stuff isn't as drastic as FoxPro2 to VFP3? How about the .NET Framework taking over the responsiblity that used to be up to languages, or how about VB becoming fully OOP? That stuff is a "logical" progression making all the new stuff "proven"?
>
>You've fooled yourself into believing.