>Sorry, George, but I can't accept this as a good reason to define all classes in PRGs and give up using the class designer. I don't think it worths it.
>
>Vlad
>
>>One reason is that the memory required for PRGs is significantly less than VCXs. This is something that I had heard, but never tested until now. I created a simple class with one custom property and one custom method. Using SYS(1016), I measured how much memory was used by these objects. The PRG used approximately 11K less than the VCX. I test this twice, re-starting VFP each time with the same results.
>>
>>In general, I use both, depending strictly on what the class is designed to do and work with.
>>
>>George

It's strictly a matter of style and design, Vlad. Neither one is inherently better than the other. They both have their strong points and weak ones, as well.

George