The version I used, that Refox failed to decompile, was the 2.25 version, posted 19DEC2001. I absolutely saw what I saw. <s>

Hank

>Hi Hank
>
>>Actually, that's my report they based that on, and they got it wrong. V.2 does protect it (I couldn't decompile with ReFox), but their first beta of 2.5 does not, apparently (this is their judgment) because of the reason given.
>
>I emailled Chad about Armadillo V2 and VFP last year Sep/Oct. A friend of mine stripped off Armadillo, in two different ways, and gave me back my source code in no time at all. I passed this info to Chad back in Oct last year and he explained it was because the VFP source code is in the resource area. Armadillo V2 absolutely does not protect a VFP application and Chad admits this in an email to me. His website states that V2.5 will protect against ReFox.
>
>HTH
>
>Jos