Don't know what happened to my post; I thought I already posted this message, but anyway,
You may find this interesting:
http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q158238Tracy
>Steve,
>
>I just checked on one of our machines that is running the 2nd Edition of W98. At the command window typing 'VER' results in '4.10.2222'
>
>As far as I can see W98 sits on top of DOS 4.10.2222.
>
>
>
>>You don't think so about which statement? I am positive the 4.00 refers to the Windows version. Further, I know that the DOS version in Windows 9x is *not* 4. Version 4.1 was, as Tom stated, the most unstable version of DOS released. Most people stayed with DOS 3.x (.2?) until DOS 5 came out. DOS 6.2 was the final MS-DOS release.
>>
>>BTW, Windows 2000 is version 5...of Windows, that is <g>
>>
>>>Steve,
>>>
>>>>>Hi Doug,
>>>>>
>>>>>That means Windows version 4. The DOS version is 7.x, I think...
>>>
>>>Don't think so.. Are you thinking of DR DOS perhaps? Or Novell DOS, which it became?
>>>
>>>
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"