Hey Kevin,
As someone who's in many threads about how VB.NET didn't carry enough baggage from VB6, I was wondering what you mean by VB .NET's syntax baggage compared to C#.
C++ makes sense - they just added managed extensions to it. But VB.NET? It's more verbose than C# (like VB and VFP), but I don't see the baggage... Can you or anyone give me some examples?
yag
>Michel!
><snip> <snip>
>Also, if you're diving into .NET, I highly recommend looking at C#...it is a *very* nice language, AND it was designed specifically for working with the .NET Framework. Other languages such as VB.NET and C++ carry a bit of syntax "baggage" as compared to C#.
>
>Regards,
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement