Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Listserv interface
Message
From
19/08/1996 15:32:12
 
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00006129
Message ID:
00006134
Views:
46
>2) About the way "subject" is constructed: If u order messages by subject,
>u get them orderd as they were posted, because of the number of message (in
>square brackets), making it dificult to follow an specific thread of
>disscussion. My suggestion is to construct the subject line as:
>
>VFP (Category_Identifier) Title_of_message [Number_of_message]
>
>Where:
>Category_Identifier: a naming convention for UT categories for Visual
>FoxPro Section (maybe Michel already have one in mind).
>
>Title_of_message: It would be important to avoid the "Re:" substring,
>because the order would be messed, and u could always know it is a replay
>because of the way "From" is constructed.
>
>Number_of_message: no explanation needed.
>
>This way, ordering incoming mail by subject would order messages by UT
>section (VFP), then by category, then by an specific thread, and finally by
>the order they were posted.
>
>Maybe the category naming convention could be used to post a new message to
>an specific category?

These are all good suggestions but people using listserv will not used 10% of it. This is my guess. Remember, here you have so many gadgets and there is a need for that. But, believe me, no one is going to take the time to enter VFP [4] to specify that is has to go in category 4. They just want to create their message and have an answer ASAP. Even here in the Universal Thread, some people are not choosing their category when creating a message. They just keep the one that is chosen by default.
Michel Fournier
Level Extreme Inc.
Designer, architect, owner of the Level Extreme Platform
Subscribe to the site at https://www.levelextreme.com/Home/DataEntry?Activator=55&NoStore=303
Subscription benefits https://www.levelextreme.com/Home/ViewPage?Activator=7&ID=52
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform