>>You have to help yourself a bit! Every suggestions I made were defeated! Do >you change your server this often? Do you know that when you change a server, >you can give the exact name to the new one?
>please dont think that way, i really appreciate all your sincere suggestions thanks very much and i had no intentions to defeat any, i'm sorry if u felt so.
>well the only reason about all of my concerns was I want to build up a structure with minimum intervention of network/srver groups.
>see in large organizations its a bit tedious when u have separate server management/network/development group. though i'm the part of serv. mgt and dev. group and even though all group are well integrated sometimes i feel if the application is able to handle most of environmental changes its good for everyone.

As a consultant, I work for large company and it has never been a problem to create groups to serve application. Putting apps updates on a file server never been a problem too. Maybe you should now consider building Internet applications (no client deployment and or updates, only to the server).