>>>>>>If the only way of getting points is to try and bloody race for them and give up my working day, then screw the points!!!
>>>>>
>>>>>You should read the press release I initiated for the status on that.
>>
>>Doesn't alter my view, there have only been 2 changes and they are nothing to do with the way people are ranked.
>>
>>Most people are naturally helpful, those who are can live without the points.....
>
>Just my two cents, but the points system to me is not reward (at least for those with a decent self-esteem) system. It is a system to be able to historically query for a solution and know which answer solved the problem.

I totally agree. So why have points?

>So I can then filter through those who took shots at solving the post (I am guilty of this) and get to those that solved the post.

I do not have this luxury, but I see your point.

>As for those that have time to solve the problems. This site has always had its share of fast problem solvers. Since I have been a member (I think from the start of the UT) the power answerers seem to change about every two years. They have jobs that give them time to solve problems, then after a time they move on to jobs that do not afford them this luxury. I myself am happy to see a few hot shots here answering questions. But as in gunfights the quicker draw does not always hit the intended target. Sometimes it is the slow thoughtout response that will hit dead on.

I agree with your last comment, you sometimes get a very innacurate answer.

Kev