>>If there is no ranking, then why have points?
>
>There are no ranking, there are no free PUTM and there are no result to see the points given as previously available from the Reports. There has also been no thread about that since I released the Press Release. Members thought it was the best thing to do and I also think it is.

>I mentioned that the title remains because this is how we are used to make reference to that documentation.

So that's a benefit to you.

>Now, if there is a place on UT that disturbs you in regards to Points comparism between members, I would like to know about it. AFAIK, there isn't.

The fact that people on the UT appear to be point-chasing without giving anyone a hope in hell of responding, that was my initial comment.

Take away the points and let people help others because they want to help others, not to notch up their points.

>The only reference, as small as it is, is under each individual settings. That is not a comparism. I need a prompt access to it for administration purposes and members also expressed the requirement of retrieving their previous messages which have been marked for several needs.

You need the points to do this???

Kev