>>Hi Cetin,
>>
>>Snipped.
>>
>>A problem might arise if views used simply DBCName!tablename instead of pathing the DBC but I think anyone using same names should be prepared for it.
>>
>>The above and any further potential problems was what I was fishing for. What about RI? Any others? I want to be prepared. Thanks for the example.
>
>Jim,
>All let you fully specify the DBC and tablename. Being honest I'm lazy to be too much carefull and therefore don't do it myself :)
>Changing the DBC name is easier for me.
>BTW the biggest problem for me was to play with a table in low level when it was in a DBC :)
>Cetin

I went through this 2 years ago and came to the same conclusion - rename the database. A lot less headaches. Thanks.