>>So that's a benefit to you.
>
>What?

You said it helped you reference the documentation, that could potentially confuse new members.

>
>>The fact that people on the UT appear to be point-chasing without giving anyone a hope in hell of responding, that was my initial comment.
>
>That's your interpretation. No one is chasing anyone.

Well, it's funny how it was never this competetive to get a response in before the points were introduced!!

>
>>Take away the points and let people help others because they want to help others, not to notch up their points.
>
>This is irrevelant. Members are free to do whatever they want as far as taking the opportunity to help someone.

See above response, the points are obviously driving some people.

>>>The only reference, as small as it is, is under each individual settings. That is not a comparism. I need a prompt access to it for administration purposes and members also expressed the requirement of retrieving their previous messages which have been marked for several needs.
>>
>>You need the points to do this???
>
>Yes, I need it and as the members requested it, it's better to have it there than to duplicate all that effort in public and private interfaces.

Fair enough.

>I'm done with this topic. Your beating a dead horse and I can't no longer afford to spend some time on it as I already did when we worked that case with several members a few weeks ago. You should have participated in those discussions at that time. This is the conclusion about what we decided.

Like I said in the beginning, this is just a view that I am making now because I'm pretty sure it wasn't this bad several months ago.

Kev