>>Not me. Though, writing readable code may not be important to you.
>In one fell swoop, in your alleged answer to this "rhetorical" question, you not only did not answer the question ,you managed a personal slight as well.

Please stop taking things so personally.

You said that remembering the name of a variable was the ONLY thing important to you. Or did I read that wrong? I respecfully disagree, meaningful variable names go a long way in making code readable, which is important to me, and having one case only increases the readablity.

Here's an exmpale, whats "funloaddata"? Is it Fun(ction)LoadData or fUnloadData? Just a quick example; I'm sure there are better ones.

>>What makes C# lowlevel and VB non lowlevel?
>The VB language is a richer as far as functionality is concerned.

Can you explain that more thorughly please? I thought functionality wise, there were no differences in the language (except of course, C#'s advanced functionality).

>Also, based on the docs and the number of comparisions with C/C++, C# strikes me as being a "lower level" language - not that this is a bad thing...

"Strikes" you? Exactly, which parts of the language in particular? If its case sensitivity, semi colons, and brackets, does JavaScript strike you as a low level language as well?

>So when you create a class and you have to implement the curly braces, all the case sensitive crap - you are going to tell me that C# is more efficient????

Whats more effecient:

public class1{}

or

Public Class VisualBasicClass
End Class

IMO, niether. Learning to close your IF with a "}" as opposed to a "END IF" is the exact same thing. I think the fact that you don't like the symbolic nature of the bracket as opposed to the wordy END IF is clouding your judgement at this point. If anything, you'd think the less typing would be more effcient, but for the sake of argument, I'll ignore that advantage.

The case sensitivity "crap", as you technically refer to it, as I've said, does not hinder my effecincy at all.

>I think you are arguing with me for the sake of arguing with me...

Thats not true. In actuality, I think there are alot of things you said in the last two messages that are wrong, and you know it, yet you said them anyways to support your opinion.