Hi Mike,

According to the help file, the syntax for the Return command is:

RETURN [eExpression | TO MASTER | TO ProcedureName]

I never knew it was possible to append a value after ProcedureName. So it seems to me that RETURN TO ProcedureName .F. should produce a compilation error (as it's happening), while RETURN TO ProcedureName 123 compiling ok is a bug, IMO.

I'm using VFP 6.0 SP5.

Just curious, how it was suposed to behave such a return?

Fernando