Actually, I believe that if you added in the substitute's judge's scores (after throwin out the disqualified judge's scores) then the Canadian's would have been ahead of the Russians. I read that and heard it on the news. I don't know who the substitute judge was though. They only threw out the scores from the French judge, but did not add in the substitute's judges scores. Probably because that would have justified retracting the gold medals given the Russians and that would NEVER happen.
:0)
Tracy

>>The judge admited to giving an unjustified score, they threw out the scores she gave and the two pairs were tied. Seems pretty clear cut.
>
>I understand what happened. Wether or not thats fair is a different story. Also, if its this clear cut, why must the investigation continue? This is a tough scenario, and teh answers haven't been found yet, but in the meantime, gold medals were thrown out to make it look like everything's been resolved.
>
>It seems to me that regardless of what the investigation finds, and who the real winner is determined to be will be pointless because there is no way that the ISU will retract the 4 golds it gave.
>
>>What's lamer is trying to pass off the above statement as an argument. Hehe
>
>Which statement?