Just so you know how sick I really am - y computer at the time was a 486/66 with 16Mb RAM. I actually insalled and ran NT 3.5 Workstation on that box just so I could work in VFP3 - Under Win3.1 it was crashing every 5 minutes. Under Win95, every hour or so. under NT3.5 - hardly ever. It might take 2 hours to boot the computer, but once running, it stayed running. Which is why for the most part I stuck with NT workstation varients through the years, because it was always the most stable. I also NEVER did an upgrade install, always fresh installs, excpet recently when I upgraded Win2K to XP Pro - I did an in-place upgrade, and amazingly, it has worked out great, on 2 dfferent systems.
Randy
>LOL! I can laugh now but I can remember the pain of using 3.11 and VFP 3.0 together. Yes, Windows 95 was a good improvement. It was like a breath of fresh air. Someday all of this software/hardware will work together. :) (Do not hold your breath)
>
>Tom - The eternal optimist (sometimes) I have been known to smile :)
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only