Well, it was mostly the feeling, yours and Mike's messages left. Anyway, I admit, that I didn't state the problem clearly the first time (and it was hard to do so, because it seemed weird from the begining), so these replies are partially my fault.

Anyway, I got over them and tried to find a rational piece in each of the reples, so no hard feelings left...

Thanks again for your help.

>SNIP
>>
>>I already changed the code, but I spent ~4h. on Friday debugging it and some time during this weekend not to mention not very polite replies from you and Jim (and partially it was my fault of not explaining the problem well, but you can understand my frustration at the time, the original message was written).
>SNIP
>
>Wow! The QUEEN of pickiness calling my participation "impolite". I don't know whether to laugh or puke!
>
>Then she goes on to absolve (used that word twice today) herself. I couldn't see your frustration, no. And that's an excuse for using the title you did and for not posing the proper question too?
>
>I could have ignored the post, but decided that I might try to help.
>I mentioned 2 things:
>1) What am I missing here?
>2) If you're gonna put code like that out, comment it so that....
>
>Were these the impolitess that you refer to, or was there something else???