Ohh.. a very good question. If you find out, let me know.


>Is there a way in some standard UML diagram to indicate which classes actually have code to implement the methods?
>
>I'm faced with several situations in documenting and fixing an existing class hierarchy designed and developed by another developer that is no longer around. where I need a diagram to make life easier
>
>1) an abstract method is defined in a superclass and whether or not it's implemented in each subclass
>
>2) a subclass contains code for an inherited method
>
>3) a class defines a method, but doesn't have code in the method (it's not really an abstract method it's an error in the design)