First off, Christof posted a question here asking for adivce. I gave it to him. The fact that you do not like the advice is not surprising. I have read your postings on this subject. Your company obviously did not agree with what he did, but what he did is often done by developers. If you were continuously having problems from his domain, I could understand your position. This case appears to be an isolated incident and certainly doesn't warrant the steps your company took. In fact, if it were a hacker, your email would probably make him more intrusive.

I already am using a competitor. I have to consider more than just VFP in the decision of what tools I use.

If you feel you need to drop support for VFP, it is a business decision that you have to make. You would not be the first company to do so.

>How ludicrous is this? How many more times is necessary to state that no attempt was made by us to intrude into Mr. Lange's network (which, as he says, is on a dynamic IP address). The firewall entry provided shows no security breach, just a single access to his own web server. You do not know all the facts because he has not disclosed them all. Why do you feel the need to apparently support and add further provokaction to this ridiculous discussion? By all means, if you prefer, please feel free to go to a competitor, assumng you can find one that offers UML tool with an up-to-date, supported VFP Interface! I'm beginning to question if we are doing the right thing by trying to provide an affordable, well supported UML tool for the VFP community.
>
>Rob Pritt,
>Visual Object Modelers