Rob,

Oh.. Ok.. I just wanted to make sure you knew about it. I probably read your messages and didn't put two and two together. Sorry about that!

Now.. As far as having made a mess of things here. You may well have inadvertantly ruffled a few feathers (we're an independent bunch!) but the worst thing you could do is disappear. We have mud fights all the time around here and you'll find they are a huge source of information and knowledge. Folks here don't usually hold grudges. We all know we make boo boos and at least you've been man enough to admit it. <g>

Personally I think you and Christof need a little sleep. <bg>



>Doug,
>I am very familiar with thread over at West Wind and have been an active (and helpful ;-) participant in it. Both us at Visual Object Modelers and Markus and his people at EPS Software are working hard to address the issues raised.
>Also, I believe that David's issues pertain to the VFP interface (developed by EPS Software) that has been around for about a year. EPS have recently been working on an update to the VFP Interface that resolves a good number of user reported issues and brings the round-trip process closer to 100% (but is any round-trip process ever truly 100%, I'm not convinced it is).
>As I am not that familiar with the VFP Interface, I would need to defer to Markus to comment on the issues raised by David and others. I know Markus has some strong feelings about the risks involved in adding certain requested features to the interface.
>BTW, I am not a regular on this forum. I only joined this morning because I was informed of the postings that had been made about how we dealt with Mr. Lange. However, judging by the mess I've made of things I should probably leave and never show my face here again!
>I am however a regular on the West Wind message board where there is a section dedicated to Visual UML for VFP. That is probably a better place to interact.
>Rob