>Kevin,
>
>one more question to get on the right path.
>
>We evaluated both your ccontrls.vcx Controls and the kcustctl.vcx controls (the ones where label and control are in one container).
>We tested the ccontrls.vcx ones according to security and language translation. It seems like the standard controls cover both features excellent, without the container arround. The only real container feature we found was the possibilty to get the security rectange around label and control.
>
>Did we oversee anything or do the container based contols bring any further advantages that we really didn't see ?
>
>We don't feel stong about using the container ones in this project, even we see the advantage forr other people and projects of getting label and control moved and maipulated in one place.
>
>Marcus

The one thing I've found is that if you use "Must Key" fields (setting this in the control, not with business rules) you have to use the container controls. Hmm...that's all I can think of (beyond the security stuff).