Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
How stable is VFP 7?
Message
De
26/03/2002 23:44:15
 
 
À
26/03/2002 20:38:35
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
00637273
Message ID:
00637663
Vues:
23
>Ed,
>
>>snip<
>
>>
>>I hate Norton AV - I like Trend and Panda, with Trend being my first choice. I check for updates at least every 4 hours - at home, it's every two.
>
>What version(s) of Trend would you recommend? I took a peek and it looks like they have desktop versions or corporate editions (with licenses in multiples of 25). I'm presuming that the engine is essentially the same and that the corporate server edition 'reaches out' to the various connected desktops and performs a scan from the server to the desktop as opposed to each desktop having the desktop version installed. Is that your take?

At the Corporate level with real servers, I use ServerProtect on the NT 4.0 and Win2K Server family (I've used it with SBS 2K, NT 4.0 TSE, NT 4.0 Server, and Win2K Server and Advanced Server both with and without TS, in both remote admin and application mode) and OfficeScan, triggered on all systems during login from the login script. Except in systems with a single server, I use either the second DC or a member server not running TS in application mode as the install server, with all other servers running as ServerProtect normal servers. The install server performs pull updating of both ServerProtect and OfficeScan components from Trend every 2-4 hours, and performing a push deploy of updated patterns immediately after download, and pull deploy of both pattern and program updates on each system login. I've used their mail server protection products for both Exchange 2K and mDaemon; I've no experience with their Novell server-based products, although I have used OfficeScan on systems with both the Novell and MS Clients for NetWare under Win98 and Win2K Pro, using a triggered OfficeScan examination of NetWare volumes to keep viruses from smacking around the older NetWare servers I still support; I think I have two or three clients where I manage the design of their infrastructure who still run NetWare of various flavors from the discontinued 3.20 to 5, and all are slated to retire these last remaining vestiges of Novell within the year, having moved all from either server mode under 3.2 or NDS to AD.

Each Desktop 'runs' it's own AV; the install server controls the acquisition of patterns and clients for the PC and pushes out updates immediately to all normal servers, workstation patterns immediately in the background, program updates after 6 hours at most or at first idle, as well as allowing systems to pull patterns and programs each time the PC logs in or reboots. All virus reporting is managed from the servers, as is the enterprise-wide AV schedule maintenance, and a ServerProtect server can initiate virus checking on one or all systems it manages, and can perform a HouseCall-like cooperative scan on clients. OfficeScan works with everything I'm supporting in the field for Win-based client stations, which means everything from Win98 on up through XP Pro as well as NT4 TSE, Win2K TS and Citrix MetaFrame thin clients (I don't have clients running Win95 of any flavor- they have a choice of finding an upgrade to their Win95 boxes OS or a new consultant. This isn't negotiable; there are too many disadvantages and bugs that aren't going away for me to be willing to take responsibility for ensuring that Win95 boxes can support everything properly. I also insist that NT 4 have at least SP5 and the Active Desktop updates available so that Shell.Application and WSH at least 2.0 is available, meaning that the stations have ie 4.01 or later (generally IE 5.5SP2 or IE 6; a few have older sversions of IE because they interact with remote servers that don't talk to IE 5.5 and later.) The presense of IE allows me to use InternetExplorer.Application and the WSH to help administer software version updating, relying on trusted intranet infrastructure to move around updates as well as to access various network administration tools.

It's not cheap, but so far, it's kept stuff from nailing servers, quarentined the few infections that leaked through before damaging things extensively, and caught a lot of crap either as it came into the mail server, to the local station through access to untrusted sites and email where the enterprise did not administer their mail server locally under my control but reached the mail client.

Standalone or in small peer-to-peer LANs, I swear by PC-Cillin 2K, which is the same basic client engine and pattern engine as OfficeScan. Craptops -erm- laptops that travel with salesmen who rarely are tied into the office network directly tend to run that, and their contact with the enterprise is via TS session, which is controlled by the ServerProtect/OfficeScan combination, even if the marketroid gets annoyed and disables the AV software and nails his travelling companion. OfficeScan is compatible with XP Remote Desktop sessions and PCAnywhere sessions.

I've no tolerance for Norton AV at the enterprise level, and find that Trend's products make a lot more sense to me and my clients than McAfee/NAI's suite. I like the server-side control and monitoring features. And it's treated me well so far. And I give Trend a lot of credit for making HouseCall available on-demand to the public through their web site.

>
>>
>>I point out that they can spend the extra money now and not have the worries, or they can spend it later and shell over a fair chunk to a consultant
>>
>>Even paranoids have enemies!
>
>Are you talking about me???
>

Who told you? < g >
EMail: EdR@edrauh.com
"See, the sun is going down..."
"No, the horizon is moving up!"
- Firesign Theater


NT and Win2K FAQ .. cWashington WSH/ADSI/WMI site
MS WSH site ........... WSH FAQ Site
Wrox Press .............. Win32 Scripting Journal
eSolutions Services, LLC

The Surgeon General has determined that prolonged exposure to the Windows Script Host may be addictive to laboratory mice and codemonkeys
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform