Nope, here's an excerpt (one message) from the thread:
This machine is used exclusively for processing large VFP batches. It has a gig of Ram and a raid 5 array. I guarantee there is no streaming music or video, no intensive graphics on it. I do notice that before the second processor large processes would drive the processor up to 100% utilizations -- so I guess it was just disk activity that was hitting the processor that hard.

The thread is an interesting one and well worth reading. Even more important is remembering its content.

Cheers

>more than likely, the additional processor freed up some other non-vfp bottlenecks so that everything ran faster (unless it was a vfp mtdll..)
>>>>Can Visual Foxpro benefit from multiple-processor machines?
>>>
>>>A VFP app itself is single-threaded, and therefore will only benefit in that the OS can offload some work to other processors.
>>
>>So how does that explain...Thread #472486???
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>However, you can create multi-threaded VFP COM DLLs that will use all processors on the box. I regularly pound the stuffing out of VFP MTDLLs on my big quad box, at a rate of over a million hits per day, and they work great.