>>>>>>I should add that from my experience with a network windows load, you still need to install System 32-bit files on the individual machine, update the INIs, etc. You have done that?
>>>>>
>>>>>that's where they are...
>>>>
>>>>That sounds fine then. I imagine you've checked out the WIN & SYSTEM INIs to make certain all paths are correct?
>>>
>>>all of the paths are correct...
>>
>>I guess a next step would be to try running win32s manually and see what happens.
>>
>>Also, do these machines have win32 installed for any other apps? That causes trouble sometimes, as you've likely heard.
>>
>>(BTW, these network loads are going obsolete - we dumped our last (subnet) one when they got pushed into Win 95 - if you heaven't already hinted at this to clients.)
>
>win32s run manually gives no errors (i guess that's good), and i don't think any other apps are using win32s (wordperfect 6.0 for windows is as advanced as these guys get).
You tried your app with win32s on and results were exactly same?
The Anonymous Bureaucrat,
and frankly, quite content not to be
a member of either major US political party.