Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
SPT vs. XMLUpdateGram
Message
De
06/04/2002 10:46:11
 
 
À
06/04/2002 09:21:50
Bob Tracy
Independent Consultant
Driftwood, Texas, États-Unis
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Base de données, Tables, Vues, Index et syntaxe SQL
Divers
Thread ID:
00641723
Message ID:
00641801
Vues:
12
Bob,

Let me "second that emotion." We use SQLXML at EPS on many of our current projects, and the new 3.0 version also has features (which I have not used yet) to easily expose SQL Server Stored Procs as Web Services. Very interesting and useful technology.

Your use of SQLXML looks very compelling.

>You might want to take a look at the MS SQLXML 3.0 toolkit. I have been using the beta tools for a while and switched to version 3 when it was released to manufacturing about a month ago. It appears to be very stable.
>
>I have developed a data class that implements SQLXML using the SQLXML OLE DB provider supplied with the toolkit. You supply the data tier with an XML request, it provides an XML reply.
>
>Take a close look at the use of mapping schemas. To me, this is one of the neatest tools to come along in quite a while. They are essentially SQL view generators. Mapping schemas allow you to map table columns to XML document elements and establish relationships between tables.
>
>You can then query the database using XPath or SQL queries to retrieve data and use Updategrams to make changes. Datasets from multiple sources can be retrieved in one pass to the server.
>
>I didn't find the learning curve too steep, but the documentation (as always) leaves a lot of unanswered questions that you just have to solve on your own. All-in-all, I think SQLXML is a great tool.
>
>Regards,
David Stevenson, MCSD, 2-time VFP MVP / St. Petersburg, FL USA / david@topstrategies.com
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform