The difference is that a dynamic recordset keeps score of every change made on all the underlayed tables that other users have done. Just like a VFP table. On the other hand, a remote view once loaded doesn't know what changes has been made to the underlayed tables until it is saved.



>>I think the second question: "there's no equivalent to dynamic recordsets
>>in ADO" is still to be solved. He means that there is no equivalent in a
>>VFP remote view or SPT cursor to an ADO dynamic recordset. Perhaps someone
>>has 'emulated' the dynamic recordset behavior.
>
>Ok, I'll bite: I should know the answer to this better, but what's the difference between a dynamic recordset and a remote view?