Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Parameter List Bug
Message
 
To
13/04/2002 10:30:55
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Classes - VCX
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00642946
Message ID:
00644750
Views:
25
> Untill I can get our software refactored into something that at least resembles a product that has actually been engineered I have to live with what I have. Remember, inside of Visual FoxPro 7.0 is FoxPro 6.0, 5.0, 3.0, 2.5a, 2.5, 2.0, FoxBase + 2.10, FoxBase 2.0 and FoxBase 1.0
>code. The operating environment that this product has had to work with is quite wide and varied. I think that the developers have done a great job being able to both move the product forward for the some eighteen years of its existence with as few problems as they do indeed have. I cannot in my mind justify criticizing them in as harsh a fashion as I've seen some do. Now, Microsoft itself may,as a result of their corporate policies be adding to the troubles rather than reducing them but as far as I can see they've pretty much let the FoxPro developers have their way with developing the product and I will absolutely assert that we have a far better product now than Clipper or dBASE, our old competitors. Where are they these days in the great scheme of things? We're still here, being developed (VFP 8 is on the way, remember?) with at least a good ten years of time to keep plying our skills. Will we always be in the forefront? Nope, not even now though VFP can do some things other
>products can only dream about.
>
>
>What justifies all the fuss??
>
"Microsoft Corporate Policies" that make that talented developers like yourself accept that your products are not be at the levels of QA that any other industry would consider minimal. Would it be acceptable that GM would not report a small bug, a screw that's loose, because they do not have the time to maintain a customer support system or because car dealers are sloppy when they report loose screws?

"Microsoft Corporate Policies" that are the cause that VFP is probably better than it used to be, but not nearly as good as it could have been if reasonably professional criteria of Quality Assurance had been the norm at Microsoft during the last 15 years and probably more importantly, if the real potential of the product had been recognized.

People like Jim who do not accept this situation, although like the rest of us, he could work around most of the bugs.

My 2 Euro cents of dead horse...

Marc

If things have the tendency to go your way, do not worry. It won't last. Jules Renard.
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform