>>The table HAS to have an order set to see these results. I can't think of a single grid that I have in use that doesn't need the records in any particular order. To order records in a grid, I have to set the index. If this wasn't a requirement, I wouldn't have a problem. Can you please run your test with an index set on the table?
>>
>>There is not filter on the cursor. I have an index on deleted() and DET DELETED is ON.
>>
>>I don't understand why you are suggesting scenarios to slow the grid down...
>Hi,
>I set the table to another tag than searchfield and to one same as searchfield. Results are same.
>Grid refresh were instant in both cases again.
>Table I used for test was a copy of customer.dbf with 167808 recs, index on upper(contact) and company.
>I told those scenarios, to remind you of possibilities slowing down a refresh.
>I don't want you to use them, just trying to help.
>Cetin
Well, this I don't understand. I appreciate your efforts in testing. It sounds like we are testing the same scenarios, but getting different results. I think I will call MS to see if they have any insight on the problem. thanks.
Erik Moore
Clientelligence