You're welcome, Daniel.

I agree that Hacker's Guide is an excellent source regarding bugs, and it does so directly too.

But it is by no means complete. For instance I just checked the V7 book for the bug in ATC() and it is not mentioned.

It does an excellent job for sure, but cannot be trusted as an ONLY source. Nor can any list here, by the way. Only MS has that knowledge.


>Jim,
>
>Thanks for your research!
>
>Funny nobody mentioned HackFox so far (sorry if I've missed it). IMHO it contains probably the most complete list of bugs. For each command/function/property/method, it contains information about "features" that don't behave as expected. It also contains version specific information. Additionally, the book provides workarounds.
>
>I realize the copyright issue won't allow us to use/publish the info. It sure would be very useful to extend this knowledge.
>
>BTW, I wouldn't be surprised if MS is using the bug list of HackFox to eliminate bugs ;-)
>
SNIP