>>>Yesterday, I made a suggestion for a UT enhancement via the Task Tracker. With all the recent posts about bugs, I came up with an idea that, IMV, would be better than having a specific category for them. This idea is outlined on the Task Tracker. Since people may make comments one the utility of such an idea, I would appreciate all interested parties in doing so.
>>>
>>>Naturally, whether or not this is actually implemented is up to Michel. One of the factors that I'm sure he'll consider is the utility of the enhancement. You can let him know your feelings by entering coments. Where appropriate, I will respond to such comments.
>>
>>I think, it's good idea, but I doubt, all members with use it. Perhaps, we need one oversee person (how about you? :), who would update this new KB in case, people didn't do it...
>
>I don't think that this requires one person. I think it requires all of us. Let's take one of your personal experiences as an example.
>
>NN: When try to check for numeric overflow using Alias.FieldName = 1 / 0, it doesn't work in VFP 7.0, where it did in 6.0.
>
>GT: The behavior has changed between the two versions. Please enter this in the BWFKB. The workaround is...
>
>I think that would be sufficient.

It would be sufficient in my case (and even without additional reminder), but it could be still difficult for new comers. Say, Jim compelled a long list of bugs, they now should be inserted in this new KB, right? It's still easier for lots of people to write a message about found problem (bug) here rather than in KB and check KB for existance of the bug.

So, I see your idea as a good enhancement and useful, but not for everyone. If some new user will forget to put bug into KB, somebody has to do so instead...