Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
VFP 7/Win2K slower than VFP 6/Win98 ?
Message
From
19/04/2002 18:15:02
 
 
To
19/04/2002 17:10:34
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00647068
Message ID:
00647115
Views:
19
>>It's only one PC, the Win2K machine replaced the other one. They're both on the network, but in both cases VFP was installed (only) to the local HD. Both were running Mere Mortals (also upgraded to 7.0 with the new machine) off a network drive. But it doesn't 'feel' like a network problem. It seems like something running in VFP's background. I suspect performance won't change if I drop off the network, but then I can't post that answer. ;)
>
>Is it possible that the virus scanner on the new machine is set to be more intrusive?

I talked to the network admin about that just before the upgrade. DBF and CDX files are excluded from scanning, but he won't exclude .TMPs, which I agree with. The same version, same options (Norton AntiVirus Corporate) was installed.

This is bugging me the most during development. My other recent troubles (C5 crashes) are probably just compounding the annoyance. I suppose I could live with it, but when I get to watch it paint the Properties window everytime I open a class.. *sigh*.
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform