>>That they can have $40+ billions in the bank says that
>> they may have been overcharging a tad on their software,
>> wouldn't you think? At the very least
>No, I wouldn't. I would think that they are damn good at doing business :)
>
>Don't take me wrong, I would like software to come with less (perhaps much less) bugs than it does today. Yet, I understand if it doesn't.

I was confident of that, Hector.
Here's my problem... so many people accept the situation, either outright or by saying (as you do) 'I don't like it but I understand' that there is really no impetus for MS to change anything!

I do not understand how MS can have $40+ billions in the bank and yet deliver software that continues to reflect (many many) same bugs from release to release to release. I can understand why they might wish to get away with it, but I can't understand why we let them.
I also can't understand why the shareholders aren't screaming to get a handsome dividend out of them!