Well, that explains it!
>>Ok, I have to jump in here and contradict you Evan. NT 4.0 was a VERY problematic OS for a server and NT3.51 was even worse. In fact, I went through the entire MCSE for NT 4.0 and W2k training twice (paid for by my employer :o) and the general rule of thumb and practice out there was to reboot the server to fix errors on a regular basis-this was even admitted by the separate CERTIFIED training facilities. Yet I had Novell servers running for 6 years without EVER having to reboot once. Hard to imagine, but true.
>
>Microsoft NEVER tested NT by leaving the server running for an extended period of time. They would go home at night and turn off the server. I was told this by a Program Manager in the Win2K group. This changed with Win2K. Stability was the number one goal (even if it compromised comptability) and servers ran for months without rebooting.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
